Skip to main content
Key takeaway: For texting leads back, Ares is a text-first AI operator, not a phone receptionist. It answers by SMS, email, and chat within seconds. If you need someone to actually answer calls, look at a voice-capable service instead.
If you’re searching for “AI receptionist” because leads aren’t getting answered fast enough, the tool that fixes that problem is usually a text-response system, not a phone system. Ares answers new leads by SMS, email, and web chat the moment they come in; it does not pick up the phone.

What is an AI receptionist, and does it have to mean voice?

Most people typing “AI receptionist” into a search bar picture a phone getting answered, since “receptionist” has meant a person or a phone tree picking up a call for decades. An AI receptionist is defined, in the loosest sense, as software that greets an inbound customer contact and moves it forward without a human doing it first. Under that definition, voice is one channel, not the whole category. Text-first lead response means the AI’s primary job is answering SMS, email, and web chat messages instead of phone calls. That distinction matters, because a huge share of home service leads never call at all; they fill out a form, text a number from an ad, or message a Google Business Profile listing. A tool built to text back fast solves that problem directly. A tool built to answer calls solves a different, narrower problem.

Does Ares answer phone calls?

No, and it’s worth stating plainly rather than burying it: Ares is text-first. It does not answer inbound phone calls today. It responds to leads by SMS, email, and chat, qualifies them, books the appointment, and follows up if they go quiet. Voice answering, along with call tracking, is on the roadmap but not live. If your business gets most of its leads by phone and needs something to physically pick up and talk to a caller, Ares is the wrong tool for that job. Keep reading for what to use instead.

Why text-first response wins for lead capture

For the leads that come in as forms, texts, ad clicks, or web chat messages, text-first response has a real speed advantage over anything that requires a phone conversation to happen first.
  • Speed to first contact. A Harvard Business Review study by Oldroyd and McElheran (2011) found that companies contacting a lead within an hour were roughly seven times more likely to have a meaningful conversation with that lead than companies that waited even a little longer. A text reply goes out in seconds; a callback waits on someone being free to dial.
  • No phone tag. A lead who ignores an unknown number still reads the text that follows it, which sidesteps the “did they even see it” problem that plagues callback-based response.
  • Lower friction for the lead. Plenty of people, especially younger homeowners, would rather text back and forth about a quote than get on a call.
  • Consistent qualifying questions every time. A human answering the phone under pressure skips questions. An AI following a fixed sequence doesn’t.
McKinsey’s adoption research has found that a majority of businesses now report using AI in at least one business function, and lead response is one of the more common places that shows up first, because the return on faster response time is so direct and measurable.

Text-first AI vs. voice AI receptionist vs. traditional answering service

Use this table as a starting filter, not a final answer. Plenty of businesses genuinely need both channels covered.

When do you actually need a voice-capable receptionist?

If most of your leads dial a number, whether that’s a Google Business Profile “call” button, a yard sign, or word of mouth, you need something that answers calls. Text-first tools won’t help a caller who hangs up when nobody picks up. In that case, look at services built specifically for phone answering. Virtual receptionist services like Smith.ai and Ruby Receptionists are built around exactly this: staffed call answering, with varying degrees of automation, picking up on the first or second ring to take messages, screen callers, or do basic scheduling. Pricing varies by plan and call volume, so check each provider’s site rather than assuming a number. Podium is also well known in the home service space for turning missed calls into text conversations automatically, a useful middle ground if the problem is specifically calls that go unanswered, not needing every call answered live. None of that is a knock on choosing voice. If your lead flow is phone-heavy, a tool that doesn’t answer the phone is the wrong purchase, no matter how good it is at texting.

A hypothetical example: two roofing companies

This is an illustration, not a claimed customer result. Company A gets most of its leads from door hangers and truck signage; people call the number on the truck. Company B runs Meta and Google ad campaigns that drive form fills and text clicks. Company A needs a voice-capable receptionist first, since the leads are calls. Company B fits a text-first tool like Ares, since the leads already arrive as messages. Plenty of real businesses are a mix of both. Look at how your leads actually arrive this month, not how you assume they arrive, before picking a tool.

How does Ares fit into this decision?

Ares is an AI operator built for home service businesses. It runs on GoHighLevel as the CRM layer and manages Google Ads and Meta ad campaigns, alongside Google Business Profile management and review request automation. When a lead comes in by SMS, email, or web chat, Ares answers within seconds, qualifies them against rules the owner sets, books the appointment directly, and follows up automatically if the lead goes quiet. Leads that need judgment get scored and escalated to a human. Multi-location operators get one fleet dashboard instead of a report per location, and every automated action respects owner-approval and opt-out compliance settings. Pricing is $299 a month standard, or $100 per seat for enterprise, with no setup fee and no long-term contract. What Ares does not do today is answer a ringing phone. Call tracking and voice answering are on the roadmap, along with Google Local Services Ads management and deeper field-service integrations. None of that is live yet. If your bottleneck is slow follow-up on leads you already generate by text, form, or chat, that’s the exact problem Ares closes. If calls ringing out is the bigger issue, pair a voice-capable service with Ares. For the broader question of what to keep in-house versus hand to an AI operator, see should I fire my marketing agency and use AI instead. For how booking works inside a text-first flow, see appointment booking.

Frequently asked questions

No. Ares is text-first: it answers leads by SMS, email, and web chat. It does not answer phone calls today. Voice answering is on the roadmap but not currently available.
Look at a voice-capable virtual receptionist service, such as Smith.ai or Ruby Receptionists, or a missed-call text-back tool like Podium if the main gap is calls that go unanswered. Check current pricing directly with each provider, since it varies by plan and volume.
Only if most of your leads already arrive as texts, forms, ad clicks, or chat messages rather than calls. If callers expect a live voice on the first ring, a text-only tool leaves that channel uncovered.
Within seconds of the lead coming in, by SMS, email, or chat depending on how they reached out. Speed matters: a Harvard Business Review study found companies responding within an hour were roughly seven times more likely to have a meaningful conversation with the lead than those who waited longer.
Yes. There’s no rule against running a voice-capable answering service for phone leads and Ares for text, form, and chat leads at the same time. Many home service businesses get leads through both channels.
$299 a month on the standard plan, or $100 per seat on the enterprise plan. No setup fee, and no long-term contract beyond month-to-month.